Head to head / AI Transcription
AssemblyAI vs Deepgram
- →AssemblyAI is more accurate in our test: 96.9% vs 95.6% word accuracy.
- →Both offer a free tier to start.
| Compared | AssemblyAI | Deepgram |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (tested) | 96.9% | 95.6% |
| Starting price | $0.15/hr | — |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Visit AssemblyAI | Visit Deepgram |
Feature by feature
| Feature | AssemblyAI | Deepgram |
|---|---|---|
| Languages | 99+ | 30+ |
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Real-time | Yes | Yes |
| Speaker labels | Yes | Yes |
| Export formats | JSON, TXT, SRT, VTT | JSON, TXT, SRT, VTT |
| Human option | No | No |
AssemblyAI
Developers who want a speech-to-text API with built-in audio intelligence like summarization, sentiment, and LLM queries.
- +Universal-2 model, strong English accuracy
- +LeMUR runs LLMs over your transcripts
- +Sentiment, topics, PII redaction built in
- +Generous free credit to start
Deepgram
Developers who need fast, low-cost speech-to-text at scale, in real-time or batch.
- +Nova-3 model, very low streaming latency
- +Among the cheapest per-minute pricing
- +Self-hosted / on-prem deployment option
- +High-throughput batch processing
Compared on the metrics we track for this category. Prices are the cheapest paid tier. Some links are affiliate links.